Sitting at a desk collecting donations for charity gave Bob; a friend of mine an idea how to make the time pass more quickly.
The following day he arrived with prepared sheets of paper on which he recorded with ticks for all the women who passed him in the categories that most suited them.
Bob being a terribly honest person did not deviate from the standards he applied, and the results he obtained were quite astonishing. Bearing in mind the Central coast of NSW, Australia, Where I live have a higher number of retired persons than most inner met suburbs. Bob also precluded all children under the age of eighteen. so to enable this to be accurate, Bob did two surveys; both between 0900 and 1200 am, one on a Tuesday and the the other on a Thursday pension day. below are Bobs Results.
Thin, 116... Normal, 128... Overweight, 167... Fat, 278...Very Fat, 257.
Thin, 87... Normal, 106... Overweight, 179... Fat, 302... Very Fat, 291.
Thin, 203... Normal, 234... Overweight, 346... Fat, 580... Very Fat, 548.
Er indoors AKA my nearest and dearest, weighs in at 138 lbs or 65 kilos and is five feet seven inches or 165 centimetres tall, PERFECT.
So its a fair bet(about 7 to 1) that the broad (Broad around the beam )you are trying to get your arms around at night needs a heap of blubber removed.
How does your darling rate? don't lie, tell the truth.
Wednesday, 21 February 2007
After clashing with wrong diagnosis -hospital food sleepless nights bed sores and hospital bed cramps and more I decided to discharge myself...
In future ALL posts on this Site will have a section to be known as 'OPEN FORUM. this is to be introduced as from now and a reminder of ...
How many people out there will remember my first post, coming up now. Introduction to Daily Gaggle March 23 2005. Good morning to you al...
WE first met aboard ship where I had a brief Acquaintance with him, while being his instructor. David was a clever dick; knew every thing - ...